Bauhaus. He was fascinated in the Gestalt psychology of how we perceive information, and therefore created a language of vision to enable his students to be able to compare visual layout characteristics. This language involved a set of three exercises and visual hierarchies, each featuring differentiating qualities/rules to be followed.
Each exercise is represented using a range of shapes and scale, as well as space. These are shown in the key below:
Exercise One: The Rules
1. All elements must be encased within the rectangle/frame.
2. Visual elements cannot touch.
3. No tilting or distortion of the elements is allowed.
4. The size/weight of the elements can be altered.
Exercise One produces a visual hierarchy that is easy to interpret due to the space the surrounds each individual piece of information. The exercise bears simple, un-complex compositions that allow for shapes to be perceived distinctly. The resolutions born from this exercise are generally conventionally structured.
Exercise Two: The Rules
1. All elements must be encased within the rectangle/frame.
2. Visual elements can touch.
3. No tilting or distortion of the elements is allowed.
4. The size/weight of the elements can be altered.
Exercise Two, unlike one, allows for the grouping of visual elements, which produces more opportunity to organise. Through the grouping of information, a more complex relationship between perception of space and recognition is created. the eyes are required to use space surrounding the elements to understand the composition effectively.
Exercise Three: The Rules
1. All elements must be encased within or connected to the rectangle/frame.
2. Visual elements can touch.
3. Tilting or distortion of the elements is allowed.
4. The size/weight of the elements can be altered.
Exercise Three is much less restrictive, and therefore allows for more complex compositions to be generated. They promote a lack of structured order, potentially making for more energetic results - though perhaps more confusing. as elements are able to leave the frame, the eyes are required to work harder to perceive information.
Kepes’ uses the language of vision to demonstrate and analyse the effect of visual language on the structure of human consciousness, in particular how elements of line and form are perceived and how innovative types of perspective can lead to more dynamic representations in art and design.
‘Matching the data of experience with our abstractions, visual or verbal, we call “explanations”
or “philosophies”; when visual, we call them our “picture of the world”.’- György Kepes.